GETTING MY H4831SC LOAD DATA TO WORK

Getting My h4831sc load data To Work

Getting My h4831sc load data To Work

Blog Article

I'm a real fan of the H4831 powder. I get terrific velocity and precision outside of any caliber I have attempted it in. From the twenty five-06 up for the 338 it's my head over to powder of selection. I try every kind of powders when Doing work up loads, nevertheless the H4831 always seems to appear out on best for precision and velocity when the case is of the 06 class or larger.

I'd say you'd be superior off looking at if another person would be willing to trade you some Varget on your H4831SC.

What is the main difference? Compression. With no Intense/significant compression related to the very long grain 7828, the pressure curve was altered along with the load fell apart.

Run your load up with the precise powder (sc or regular) and whole lot you are applying even though. Similar melt away price doesn't suggest it will eventually behave "precisely" the exact same. I've witnessed about a hundred fps difference between sc and mil-surp plenty of H4831.

The only distinction as I are aware of it is that the SC was intended to function by means of powder steps improved (which it does). The lengthier grains will not feed well in any way in some measures. Thats my 02 :grin:

Liberalism; The not possible nevertheless recognized notion that it is completely possible to pick up a turd with the clean up end.

If there is not any load data it really is mainly because this powder is not ideal for this cartridge. Commonly a person won't obtain 1 powder to fit all cartridges, along with the spouse and children of cartridges with The actual powder (4831SC) that you are asking about doesn't perform.

It's possible you'll possibly: one) Go on and possess the merchandise listed below immediately removed from your shopping cart:

dioni.a.312 stated: In my experience the one actual difference would be that the shortcut meters far better through reloading devices. When it's loaded theres no useful big difference. I've read that the shortcut could possibly have a small little bit quicker melt away charge but It appears insignificant. Click to extend...

Why would I point out this? What precisely is my stage? I'm not sure that there is a actual valid position besides exactly what is popular with most has not been popular with me in any respect in these situations. Do I just Have a very powder jinx or anything? Simply to demonstrate how ridiculous I actually am, tomorrow I am assortment testing a good friends new .

Run your load up with the specific powder (sc or standard) and ton you are making use of however. Similar melt away rate doesn't suggest it can behave "accurately" exactly the h4831 vs h4831sc same. I've observed above one hundred fps difference between sc and mil-surp a great deal of H4831.

It has been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Identified a node and shot some teams. I shot a .6 5 shot team right now. It's somewhat slower than H1000, but shoots great. Many thanks for the recommendation, It really is superior to realize that I have received selections when 1 or the opposite powder is dried up.

Can I believe that H4831 may be substituted for H4831sc ? I know h4831sc the physical variance but will it influence the burn or velocity? I feel not but I am not 100% absolutely sure.

I discovered that my 7mag 160 partitions ended up sub MOA with 4831sc with h4831sc minimal to min prices. I’m conversing 2700 (perhaps 2800) fps, it had been a small 60s grain charge in the Norma circumstance. Not what I had been trying to find, but precise Even so.

Report this page